Barriers to implementation of innovative writing instruction
A mixed-method examination of collaborative and technology-enhanced approaches in Nigerian secondary schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61251/ijoep.v3i1.345Keywords:
Collaborative learning, creative techniques, digital integration, English teachers, instructional practicesAbstract
While collaborative, creative and technology-enhanced approaches show strong research support for writing instruction, few studies examine why these approaches remain underutilised in Nigerian secondary schools. This mixed-method study identified teaching practices, their pedagogical value and implementation barriers. A survey of 167 English teachers (103 public, 64 private schools) measured technique frequency using a four-point Likert scale, supplemented by open-ended responses. Quantitative findings revealed collaborative learning (M = 3.22), digital integration (M = 3.19) and text framework support (M = 3.37) were used significantly less than traditional teacher-directed methods (M = 3.60). Digital tools showed the widest variation (SD = 0.87), indicating inconsistent adoption. Qualitative analysis revealed that teachers implementing these approaches reported substantial benefits for student engagement and writing quality. However, four barriers constrained wider adoption: large class sizes, insufficient technology infrastructure, limited training in contemporary pedagogies, and examination pressures. Culturally sustaining resources, including Nigerian folktales and authentic texts, significantly enhanced engagement. The study reveals a critical paradox: innovative approaches yield pedagogical benefits when implemented, yet systemic constraints prevent widespread use. Findings inform professional development and policy initiatives to expand teachers' instructional capacity and enhance English language education in Nigerian secondary schools.
References
Abdeta, M. T., Olamo, T. G., & Woldeyes, K. M. (2026). Effects of Collaborative Writing on EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy, Fluency, and Complexity: Secondary School in Focus. Sage Open, 16(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251413940
Abubakar, U., Ogunlade, O. O., & Ibrahim, H. A. (2024). The influence of technology-integrated curriculum resources on student engagement and academic achievement in higher education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(2), 1208-1223. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.02.014
Aghayeva, J. (2025). the Using Authentic Texts to Foster Reading Competence in ESL Classrooms: Using Authentic Texts to Foster Reading Competence in ESL Classrooms. SGS-Engineering & Sciences, 1(4), 1-7. https://spast.org/techrep/article/view/5691
Ajadi, O. (2024). Potentials Challenges of Twenty-First Century Pedagogies in Nigeria. Journal of Education for Sustainable Innovation, 2(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.56916/jesi.v2i1.832
Alao, B. O., & Okoliko, A. M. (2024). Surfacing administrative issues of secondary schools in Nigeria: obstacles for a positive change and improvement in the 21st-century. KWASU International Journal of Education (KIJE), 7(1), 171-179. https://www.kije.com.ng/index.php/KIJE/article/view/97/0
Aryanti, N., Anggaira, A. S., Ardiansyah, W., & Suhono, S. (2024). The influential principles in problem-based learning: A systematic review on English language learning. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(2), 779-792. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i2.10756
Bahari, A., & Gholami, L. (2023). Challenges and affordances of reading and writing development in technology-assisted language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 7226-7250. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2065308
Bano, S., Minaz, M., & Idris, M. (2025). Overcrowded Classroom: Challenges for Elementary School Teachers. ProScholar Insights, 4(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.62997/psi.2025a-41036
Bergmark, U. (2023). Teachers’ professional learning when building a research-based education: context-specific, collaborative and teacher-driven professional development. Professional development in education, 49(2), 210-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1827011
Bhowmik, S., & Chaudhuri, A. (2022). Addressing culture in L2 writing: Teaching strategies for the EAP classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 56(4), 1410-1429. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3172
Boone Jr, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing likert data. The Journal of extension, 50(2), 1-5. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/43fc/e7d7e2100c3f4f2bc6fde5a9cb003c20162f.pdf
Booth Olson, C., Maamuujav, U., Steiss, J., & Chung, H. (2023). Examining the impact of a cognitive strategies approach on the argument writing of mainstreamed English learners in secondary school. Written Communication, 40(2), 373-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221148724
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
British Educational Research Association. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research. BERA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford university press.
Chakyarkandiyil, N., & Prakasha, G. S. (2023). Cooperative learning strategies: Implementation challenges in teacher education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 81(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.340
Chomeya, R. (2010). Quality of psychology test between Likert scale 5 and 6 points. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 399-403. https://www.academia.edu/download/31421197/Likert_Scale_5_and_6_Points.pdf
Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2018) Research Methods in Education. 8th Ed. London: Routledge. https://sutlib2.sut.ac.th/sut_contents/H108060.pdf
Creswell, J.W. and Clark, V.L.P. (2017) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/735110-studies-in-language-testing-volume-43.pdf#page=53
Denzin, N.K. (2017) The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
Dorman, W., & Dorman, S. F. (2023). Service-learning: Bridging the gap between the real world and the composition classroom. In Writing the Community (pp. 119-132). Routledge.
Ehlert, M., Hebbecker, K., & Souvignier, E. (2022). Implementing evidence-based practices in reading classrooms–longitudinal interrelations between teaching-related attitudes, innovation-specific perceptions, and perceived implementation success. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101203
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2023). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Routledge.
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health services research, 48(6pt2), 2134-2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Field, A. (2024). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage publications limited. https://users.sussex.ac.uk/andyf/dsusflyer.pdf
Garland, R. (1991). The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable. Marketing bulletin, 2(1), 66-70. https://www.rangevoting.org/MB_V2_N3_Garland.pdf
Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n364
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2016). A path to better writing: Evidence‐based practices in the classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 359-365. https://www.creatingrounds.com/uploads/9/6/2/4/96240662/a_path_to_better_writing.pdf
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 11(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163620
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554-561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
Kheryadi, K., Suseno, M., & Lustyantie, N. (2024). Flipped classroom with collaborative learning approach in enhancing writing skills of Indonesian university students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(1), 407-413. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25269
Kline, P. (2013) Handbook of Psychological Testing. 2nd Ed. London: Routledge.
Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977). 'The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data', Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Le Fevre, D., Timperley, H., & Ell, F. (2016). Curriculum and pedagogy: The future of teacher professional learning and the development of adaptive expertise. The SAGE handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, 2, 309-324. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921405.n20
Li, W., Chen, X., & Huang, L. (2024). Promoting second language writing through technology-driven multimodal text feedback. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(5), 462-479. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2315104
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, 22 (140), 55–55. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1933-01885-001
Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Majeed, A. J., & Kareem, F. (2025). Teaching difficulties in overcrowded classrooms. Journal of Humanities, 32(2), 1414-1443. https://doi.org/10.33855/0905-032-002-021
Mamba, M. A. (2024). Authentic materials: fostering collaborative language learning. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 63-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v9i2.5419
McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica, 22(3), 276-282. https://hrcak.srce.hr/89395
Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 48-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462
Morse, J. M. (2010). Simultaneous and sequential qualitative mixed method designs. Qualitative inquiry, 16(6), 483-491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410364741
Morse, J.M. (2010). 'Procedures and practice of mixed method design', in Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 339–352.
Muliani, M., Sukarni, S., & Jumadil, J. (2024). English Teachers’ Tecnological Knowledge and Some Barriers on It: The Basis for Developing TPACK Teaching Model. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(1), 499-510. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i1.9628
Nawaz, M., Nizamani, M., & Hameed, R. (2024). Analyze how children acquire language and the cognitive processes involved, including the role of environmental and social factors. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 13(3), 239-247. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00483
Nwoke, C., Oyiga, S., & Cochrane, L. (2024). Assessing the phenomenon of out‐of‐school children in Nigeria: Issues, gaps and recommendations. Review of Education, 12(3), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70011
Olayinka, S., & Deniran, E. M. (2025). Teacher–community nexus and rural schools as community knowledge hubs: a program implementation in Western Nigeria. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 10(3), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-02-2024-0026
Oshowole, S. A. (2024). Barriers impacting the integration of classroom technology in primary schools in Lagos, Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation, Saint Leo University). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED664210
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117407
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) 'Common method biases in behavioral research', Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp. 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Sabri, S. M., Ismail, I., Annuar, N., Rahman, N. R. A., Abd Hamid, N. Z., & Abd Mutalib, H. (2024). A conceptual analysis of technology integration in classroom instruction towards enhancing student engagement and learning outcomes. Integration, 9(55), 750-769. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.955051
Seherrie, A. C. (2023). Toward an innovative cooperative learning framework to counterbalance the effects of overcrowded classrooms. Axiom Academic Publishers, 1, 119-150. https://doi.org/10.62869/001c.123561
Sever, E., & Akyol, H. (2022). The impact of collaborative learning techniques on written expression, self-regulation and writing motivation. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 14(5), 587-603. http://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2022.265
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Sholikah, F., & Kusworo, B. (2025). An Investigation of The Impact of Using Peer Review on Writing Skill Development. International Journal on Advanced Science, Education, and Religion, 8(3), 323-330. https://doi.org/10.33648/ijoaser.v8i3.1223
Sims, S., & Fletcher-Wood, H. (2021). Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: A critical review. School effectiveness and school improvement, 32(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841
Sutrisno, D., Abbas, A., & Annury, M. N. (2024). Enhancing Writing Skills Through Cultural Integration: Exploring the Impact of Culturally-Responsive Writing Instruction in Diverse EFL Classrooms. Global Synthesis in Education Journal, 2(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.61667/rpm4cp30
Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (2021). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Udeh, J. C., & Onwanyi, V. (2024). Investigating the Efficacy of Integrating Nigerian Cultural Texts into the English Language Curriculum for Secondary School Students. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 7(1), 66-79. https://gnosijournal.com/index.php/gnosi/article/view/251
Waad, M. A., & Younus, R. Z. (2022). The role of audiovisual aids in teaching English. International journal of health sciences, 6(S5), 10616-10622. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS5.10840
Yahya, A., & Zainuddin, A. H. A. (2024). Class Size in English Language Teaching: Teacher's Perspective. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 12(1), 641-652. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v12i1.4975
Yin, R.K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th edn. Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elizabeth Adedokun, Theophilus Adedokun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal's license is under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
