Digital transformation of grades-related technologies at Dr. Jose P. Rizal Senior High School (2020–2024)
A case study on usability and impact
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61251/ijoep.v2i3.265Keywords:
Educational technology, innovation adoption, records management, secondary education, system usabilityAbstract
This participatory case study examines the digital transformation of grades-related enabling technologies at Dr. Jose P. Rizal Senior High School from 2020 to 2024. Grounded in principles of sociotechnical theory and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the study defines enabling technologies as digital solutions that enhance educational processes. It traces the institution's transition from manual procedures to a macro-enabled MS Excel eTool, and finally to the centralized Students Enrollment and Records Management System (SERMS). Using a mixed-methods approach that integrated historical document analysis, stakeholder feedback, and usability assessments, the research documented a four-phase progression from individual initiatives to institution-wide adoption. Findings indicate that strategic leadership, stakeholder collaboration, and user-centered design were pivotal to successful integration. Usability evaluation, based on the System Usability Scale and qualitative feedback from 31 faculty members, showed a statistically significant improvement from "Marginal" for the eTool to "Good" for SERMS, confirming strong user acceptance and improved administrative efficiency. Key success factors included sustained leadership and structured training, while primary challenges involved connectivity and interface navigation. This study contributes to understanding technology adoption patterns within the Southeast Asian public school context, offering a replicable framework for similar educational institutions pursuing digital transformation.
References
Alqurni, F. A. (2023). Evaluating the user interface and usability approaches for e-learning systems. International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering, 12(1), 333638. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijitwe.333638
Angelaki, M. E., Bersimis, F., Karvounidis, T., & Douligeris, C. (2024). Towards more sustainable higher education institutions: Implementing the sustainable development goals and embedding sustainability into the information and computer technology curricula. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 5079–5113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12025-8
Bahçekapılı, E. (2023). Predicting secondary school students' intention to use e-learning technologies. Research in Learning Technology, 31. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v31.2881
Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114–123.
Becker, A. M., Da Silva, P. F., Ayala, N. F., & Zomer, T. (2025). Exploring the factors influencing digital transformation in micro and small-sized enterprises in an emerging country: A sociotechnical systems perspective. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2024-0793
Belmonte, Z. J. A., Prasetyo, Y. T., Cahigas, M. M. L., Nadlifatin, R., & Gumasing, M. J. J. (2024). Factors influencing the intention to use e-wallet among generation Z and millennials in the Philippines: An extended technology acceptance model (TAM) approach. Acta Psychologica, 104526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104526
Bloch, M. (1953). The historian's craft. Vintage Books.
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A 'quick and dirty' usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35
Chugh, R., Turnbull, D., Cowling, M. A., Vanderburg, R., & Vanderburg, M. A. (2023). Implementing educational technology in Higher Education Institutions: A review of technologies, stakeholder perceptions, frameworks and metrics. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16403-16429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11846-x
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
DepEd. (2021). Learner Information System (LIS) support: System updates and resource allocation. Department of Education. Retrieved March 25, 2025, from https://www.deped.gov.ph/lis-support/
DepEd Palawan. (2024). Division Memorandum No. 429, S. 2024: Request facility for Learner Information System (LIS) issues to be escalated to Central Office v. 2.0 (RCO 2.0). Department of Education Palawan. Retrieved March 25, 2025, from https://www.depedpalawan.com/
Espero, M. G. G. (2024). Readiness on information system management: Its relationship on records management in schools. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(5), 123–134.
Eze, C. E., Okeke, C. C., & Nwankwo, I. (2023). Principals' administrative strategies as correlates of teachers' job performance in public secondary schools in Obollo-Afor Education Zone of Enugu State, Nigeria. IDOSR JHSS, 12(1), 3895. https://doi.org/10.59298/idosr/2023/12.1.3895
Fariz, F., & Winarsih, T. (2025). A conceptual framework for intellectual capital to drive digital transformation in Indonesia's transportation sector. APMBA (Asia Pacific Management and Business Application), 13(3).
Goldhaber, D. (2021). Impact of ICT integration on quality of education among secondary schools in the USA. Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5015
Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10934-8
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Inquirer.net. (2025, March 17). DepEd set to reduce school paperwork by 57%. Retrieved March 25, 2025, from https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/2025/03/17/deped-reduce-paperwork-57-percent
Leonard, R. (2018). EF Schumacher and intermediate technology. History of Political Economy, 50(S1), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-7033968
Lyanda, A., Ekalavya, J., & Kayaga, C. (2023). School administration support systems for educational technology adoption and students' academic achievement in secondary schools in Kenya. African Journal of Empirical Research. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.4.2.36
Mastour, H., Yousefi, R., & Niroumand, S. (2025). Exploring the acceptance of e-learning in health professions education in Iran based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Scientific Reports, 15, 8178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90742-5
Mastul, A.-R. H., de Vera, C. T., & Jayme, C. B. (2023). Understanding the use of EduTech in schools in the Philippines: Recommendations for effectiveness. Engineering Science Letter, 2(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.56741/esl.v2i02.307
Njoka, J. N., Ndiraguj, M., & Chege, S. (2020). Analysis of challenges facing ICT integration in managing public secondary schools: A comparative study of day and boarding secondary schools in the South Rift Region, Kenya. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 721. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i1.721
OECD. (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards a digital transformation of education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en
Oktarina, N., Suryanto, E., Permana, D. F., & Saeroji, A. (2025). The role of electronic records management systems in enhancing accountability in educational institutions: Evidence from Indonesian senior high schools. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 25(3), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.25.3.3
Ronquillo Jr., Z. T., Tagaza, R. B., Batino, M. R., & Aquino, M. S. (2022). School records and forms of selected public school: Headway and analysis of online management system. International Journal in Information Technology in Governance, Education and Business, 4(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.32664/ijitgeb.v4i1.126
Rudhumbu, N., Namasasu, J. S., & Zvoru, C. (2021). Predictors of behavioral intentions of teachers to adopt and use information and communication technologies in secondary schools in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 20(11). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.11.20
Schumacher, E. F. (2011). Small is beautiful: A study of economics as if people mattered. Random House.
Vlachogianni, E., & Τσέλιος, Ν. (2023). Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ): A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(17), 12954. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712954
Vlachogianni, P., & Tselios, N. (2022). Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(3), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1867938
Waßenhoven, A., Rennings, M., Laibach, N., & Bröring, S. (2023). What constitutes a "Key Enabling Technology" for transition processes: Insights from the bioeconomy's technological landscape. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 197, Article 122896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122896
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (6th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Paul Enrique C. Casas, Maria Lalaine M. Barrameda, Jessa Mae C. Elarmo, Danielle Jana Roe P. Rodriguez, Jessa Mae D. Prestado

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal's license is under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.







